In this age of new media one of the challenges that
one is faced with is deciding what to believe. It’s important to know whether
or not what you are reading is accurate information. According to Montecino
(1998), “Anyone, in theory, can publish on the Web; therefore, it is imperative
for users of the Web to develop a critical eye to evaluate the credibility of
Internet information.” Her article Criteria
to Evaluate the Credibility of WWW Resources gives tips about what to look
for to evaluate what is trustworthy news.
I
recently read an online article from the New York Times about vaccine costs, The
Price of Prevention: Vaccine Costs Are Soaring. This article caught my attention
because I have young children, and the issues surrounding vaccines are always interesting
to me. This particular article was looking at the rising costs of vaccines for
doctor’s offices and patients. The author, Dr. Elisabeth Rosenthal, is a
credible author on this particular piece. Looking at her biography, she is a
medical doctor who has been writing since her medical school days, but became a
full time journalist in 1994 (). The article itself is an objective piece; she
does not fill the article with her opinions. She interviews several parents who
have had issues with getting children’s vaccines and inserts their quotes to
provide a “realness” to the issue. The two main sources that she used were
links from the CDC and information from a pediatrician in San Antonio, Texas.
All of the links were current links that took you to other articles on the
topic or to the CDC’s website where they had information to back up the
graphics and statistics that Dr. Rosenthal used in the article. She also
included a video link of part of her interview with the Texas pediatrician. The
links and video added an extra element to the piece that would have been
unavailable in the print version of the article.
While this article provides objective information
about the cost of vaccines, and the reasons driving these costs, there are
ultimately going to be hundreds of articles and opinions about vaccines and
their effectiveness, dangers, benefits, etc. The Rosenthal article is well
sourced and a credible reference, but most people aren’t going to take the time
to look at background and search through links to get a full picture of the
topic and make their own judgment. They are generally more likely to find an
article with an opinion similar to their own and click through comments and
pictures that create a more exciting piece of reading. Therein lies the double
edged sword of unrestricted web posting: vast amounts of information versus
accurate and reliable information.
Montecino, V. (1998, August). Criteria to evaluate the
credibility of WWW resources. Retrieved July 3, 2014, from
http%3A%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~montecin%2Fweb-eval-sites.htm
Rosenthal, E. (2014, July 2). The price of prevention:
Vaccine costs are soaring. The New York Times. Retrieved July 4, 2014,
from
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/03/health/Vaccine-Costs-Soaring-Paying-Till-It-Hurts.html?ref=us&_r=0
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTracy,
ReplyDeleteThis is a great article to source for this week 3 discussion. Vaccines are very controversial. This article is a good well written and educated piece about vaccines. Like you said it is not flooded with opinions but it is well researched and put together. I think articles like this serve as a way to keep some of the personal opinions regulated. The NY times is a credible news source that distributes academically researched information with sources that can back up the information in the article. If you Google vaccines it brings up multiple links regarding mostly different people's personal opinions. It is important as a reader to be able to separate what is fact and what is opinion when reading about something, like vaccines, that could affect your life and health.